G11. How much CO2 really contributes to global warming

How much CO2 really contributes to global warming? Spectroscopic studies and modeling of the influence of H2O, CO2 and CH4 on our climate

by Hermann Harde, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Hamburg, Germany
(harde@hsu-hh.de)

Based on the actual HITRAN’ 2008 database [1] detailed spectroscopic studies on the absorbance of the greenhouse gases water, carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere are presented. The objective of these investigations was to examine and to quantify with these newly available data the influence of these gases on our climate.

The line-by-line calculations for sun light from 0.1 – 8 um (short wavelength radiation) as well as those for the emitted earth radiation from 3 – 60 um (long wavelength radiation) show, that due to the strong overlap of the CO2 and CH4 spectra with the water vapour lines the influence of these gases is significantly reducing with increasing water vapour pressure, and that with increasing CO2-concentration well noticeable saturation effects are observed limiting substantially the impact of CO2 on the warm-up of the atmosphere.

For the water vapour, which in its concentration is considerably varying with the altitude above ground as well as with the climate zone, separate distributions for the tropes, the moderate zones and the polar regions are presented.

They are based on actual GPS-measurements of the water content in these zones [2] and are applied for calculating the absorbance in the respective regions. The vertical variation in humidity and temperature, in the partial gas pressures and the total pressure is considered for each zone separately by computing individual absorption spectra for up to 228 atmospheric layers from ground level up to 86 km height.

The propagation length of the sun light in these layers, which depends on the angle of incidence to the atmosphere and therefore on the geographic latitude, is included by considering the earth as a truncated icosahedron (bucky ball) consisting of 32 surfaces with well defined angles to the incoming radiation and assigning each of the areas to one of the three climate zones.

To identify the influence of the absorbing gases on the climate and particularly the effect of an increasing CO2-concentration on the warming of the earth, a two-layer climate model was developed, which describes the atmosphere and the ground as two layers acting simultaneously as absorbers and Planck radiators. Also heat transfer by convection between these layers and horizontally by winds or oceanic currents between the climate zones is considered.

At equilibrium each, the atmosphere as well as the ground, delivers as much power as it sucks up from the sun and the neighbouring layer or climate zone. With this model for each climate zone the temperature progression of the earth and the atmosphere is calculated as a function of the CO2-concentration and several other parameters like ozone and cloud absorption, short- and long-wavelength scattering at clouds as well as the reflection at the
earth’s surface.

The simulations for the terrestrial and atmospheric warm-up show well attenuating and saturating progressions with increasing CO2-concentration, mainly caused by the strongly saturating absorption of the intensive CO2 bands and the interference with water lines. The climate sensitivity CS as a measure for the temperature increase found, when the actual CO2-concentration is doubled, assumes

  • CS = 0.41°C for the tropical zone,
  • CS = 0.40°C for the moderate zones and
  • CS = 0.92°C for the polar zones.

The weighted average over all regions as the global climate sensitivity is found to be

CS = 0.45°C with an estimated uncertainty of 30%,

which mostly results from the lack of more precise data for the convection between the ground and atmosphere as well as the atmospheric backscattering.

The values for the global climate sensitivity published by the IPCC [3] cover a range from 2.1°C – 4.4°C with an average value of 3.2°C, which is seven times larger than that predicted here.

References

1. L.S. Rothman et al., The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 110, 533–572 (2009)
2. S. Vey: Bestimmung und Analyse des atmosphärischen Wasserdampfgehaltes aus globalen GPSBeobachtungen einer Dekade mit besonderem Blick auf die Antarktis, Technische Universität Dresden, Diss., 2007
3. D.A. Randall et al., Climate Models and Their Evaluation. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [S. Solomon et al. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

Geophysical Research Abstracts
Vol. 13, EGU 2011-4505-1, 2011
EGU General Assembly 2011
© Author(s) 2011 (902)

Comments

  1. 1
    Leonard Weinstein says:

    It is not clear if the CS you quote is due to CO2 doubling while holding all else constant, or includes the net feedbacks expected. The value of 3.2 C by the IPCC included feedbacks (mainly water vapor increase from models). The value for CO2 alone doubling with no feedbacks is only 1.2 C in the IPCC quote. Would you clarify that issue please. If it is CO2 holding all else constant, your value is 2.67 rather than 7 times smaller, and the issue of feedback is still not determined.

  2. 2
    Berthold Klein says:

    Revised statement:
    The amount of feed back from any amount of CO2 is propportionally to its concentration in the atmosphere less than .ooo36 as all the O2 and N2 provide more that 90 % of the IR inbound to the earth when the 350 watts/sq meter of energy from the Sun is ignored. The “greenhouse gas effect has never been demostrated!!!!!!!!!.
    Please read both the Alan Siddons -“The hidden flaw in the greenhouse theory” and the more extenive work “Slaying the Sky Dragoon” a compilation of works by 9 physicists and knowledgeable scientists

  3. 3
    Leonard Weinstein says:

    I am sorry for being absent for a while as I had back surgery. I am still not fully recovered but improving.

  4. 4

    @4 Welcome back Leonard. I am very sorry you needed back surgery and I wish you a comfortable and speedy recovery.

  5. 5
    Mike Webb says:

    I wonder if the author includes the observation that CO2 is a coolant when mixed with water vapor: “Determination of the Total Emissivity of a Mixture of Gases Containing 5% of Water Vapor and 0.039% of Carbon Dioxide at Overlapping Absorption Bands” at http://www.biocab.org/Mean_Free_Path.pdf

Trackbacks

  1. [...] much does CO2 contribute to global warming G11. How much CO2 really contributes to global warming | Climate Clash From climate clash Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who say they've found [...]

Leave a Reply